PlatformPlatform architectureProduct tourProduct graphRisk intelligenceContinuous governanceEvidence & auditDeploymentIntegrationsExecutive view
BOM SuiteSBOMCBOMQBOMAIBOMHBOMBOM Governance
SolutionsSecurityComplianceSupply chain riskQuantum readinessAI governanceDigital trust
ComplianceCERT-InRBISEBI / CSCRFMeitYNISTEU CRAEU AI ActCERT-In SBOM guide
IndustriesBanking & Financial ServicesGovernment & Public SectorDefence & Critical InfrastructureHealthcareIndian enterprises
ResourcesResource centreSBOM resourcesCBOM resourcesQBOM resourcesAIBOM resourcesHBOM resourcesProgramme & regulationBlog
CompanyAboutSecurity & trustContact
Request a DemoTalk to an expert
How-to4 min readReviewed September 202611 sources

CBOM generation: discovering algorithms, keys, protocols and certificates

A complete CBOM is assembled from several discovery methods, each of which sees a different slice of the estate. This guide covers what each method finds, what it misses and how to merge the results.

Key takeaways
  • Network scanning shows what services negotiate; code analysis shows what applications call; artefact analysis shows what is bundled; HSM and KMS exports show keys at rest.
  • Each method has blind spots, so a CBOM needs several of them plus supplier CBOMs for products you cannot inspect.
  • Normalise everything into CycloneDX cryptographic-asset components and link each asset to the component and service that uses it.
  • NIST's NCCoE and CISA both treat automated discovery as necessary but not sufficient.

Start with scope

Before running any tool, decide what the CBOM describes: a single product release, an application in production, or the whole enterprise. A supplier producing a CBOM for a delivered product works mostly from code and build artefacts; an enterprise building an internal inventory works mostly from networks, infrastructure and key stores. CERT-In asks consumer organisations to create an internal CBOM aligned with supplier data (rec. 8.4.1.8), so in practice you need both views [11].

The NIST NCCoE's SP 1800-38 practice guide devotes a volume to the approach and architecture of public-key application discovery tools [1], and CISA's strategy expects automated discovery to be supplemented by manual collection where tools fall short [2].

Discovery methods compared

MethodFindsMisses
Network scanningProtocol versions, cipher suites, certificate chains, SSH algorithms on reachable endpointsData-at-rest encryption, internal-only services not reachable from the scanner, keys
Source-code analysisCalls to cryptographic APIs, algorithm and mode choices, key sizes set in codeConfiguration set at deploy time, third-party binaries, infrastructure
Binary and container analysisBundled libraries, certificates, keystores, private keys, configuration filesHow the code actually uses the library
HSM, KMS and PKI exportsKey algorithm, size, state and dates; issued certificatesWhere each key is used, unless tagged
Supplier CBOMsCryptography inside products you cannot inspectAnything the supplier omits; quality varies

Network discovery

Scan TLS on all listening ports, not only 443, mail, directory, database and management interfaces often run older configurations. Nmap's ssl-enum-ciphers script enumerates every cipher suite a server accepts [3]; testssl.sh reports protocols, ciphers and a range of flaws with JSON or CSV output [4]. For SSH, ssh-audit lists key exchange, host-key, encryption and MAC algorithms [5]. Each result becomes a protocol asset with its version and cipher suites, a certificate asset, and algorithm assets for the key exchange and signature schemes. Scan from inside network segments as well as from the internet.

Source-code discovery

Static analysis finds cryptographic API calls and the parameters passed to them. The sonar-cryptography plugin covers Java (JCA and Bouncy Castle), Python (pyca/cryptography) and Go, and writes a CycloneDX 1.6 CBOM including the file locations where each asset was detected [6]. cdxgen offers a cbom mode covering Java keystores and certificates and JavaScript and TypeScript source [7]. Run these in CI so each release has a CBOM, and record the evidence location, it is what developers need to fix a finding.

Binary, container and file-system discovery

Deployment artefacts contain cryptography that source code does not show: bundled OpenSSL builds, trust stores, embedded private keys and TLS configuration files. cbomkit-theia detects certificates, keys, secrets and configuration files in container images and directories [8]. Pair this with your SBOM, which already records library versions, so that a vulnerable cryptographic library can be traced to every image that ships it.

HSM, KMS and PKI

Keys held in hardware security modules and cloud key services are best inventoried from the source of truth. HSMs commonly expose key objects and their attributes through the OASIS PKCS #11 interface [9]; cloud KMS services expose key metadata through their management APIs. Export key identifier, algorithm, size, state, creation and activation dates, the fields CERT-In lists for keys [11]and tag each key with the application that uses it. From your PKI and certificate management systems, export issued certificates with subject, issuer, validity and signature algorithm.

Merge into one CBOM

  1. Normalise each result into a CycloneDX cryptographic-asset component with the right assetType: algorithm, certificate, protocol or related-crypto-material [10].
  2. Deduplicate by stable identifiers, certificate fingerprint, key ID, algorithm name plus parameters.
  3. Link certificates to their signature algorithm and public key, protocols to their cipher suites, and assets to the software components and services that use them.
  4. Attach owners and business context.
  5. Validate against the schema and required fields before publishing; see CBOM validation.

Make it repeatable

A CBOM generated once is out of date within weeks. Run code scans on every build, network scans on a schedule, and key and certificate exports at least as often as CERT-In's recommended quarterly review [11]. Keep every version so you can see what changed; see CBOM management.

How IntelliXBOM helps

IntelliXBOM generates and ingests CBOMs in CycloneDX, bringing results from different discovery methods into one versioned inventory. It validates each CBOM against required-field policies, shows diffs between versions, and correlates cryptographic assets with vulnerabilities and the business services they support.

Frequently asked questions

How do you generate a CBOM?

Combine several discovery methods: network scanning of endpoints, static analysis of source code, inspection of binaries and containers, and exports from HSMs, KMS and PKI. Normalise the results into a standard format such as CycloneDX, deduplicate them and link each asset to its owner and the service that uses it.

Can a CBOM be generated automatically?

Much of it can, using code scanners in CI and scheduled network scans. Keys in hardware, cryptography inside third-party products and embedded systems usually need exports, supplier CBOMs or manual collection, as CISA's discovery strategy acknowledges.

How often should a CBOM be regenerated?

Code-level CBOMs should be produced with each build or release. CERT-In recommends reviewing CBOMs at least quarterly, and network and key inventories should run at least that often.

Sources

  1. SP 1800-38, Migration to Post-Quantum Cryptography (Practice Guide, preliminary drafts)NIST NCCoEwww.nccoe.nist.gov/publications/practice-guide/migration-post-quantum-cryptography-nist-sp-1800-38-practice-guide
  2. Strategy for Migrating to Automated Post-Quantum Cryptography Discovery and Inventory Tools (September 2024)CISAwww.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/strategy-migrating-automated-post-quantum-cryptography-discovery-and-inventory-tools
  3. ssl-enum-ciphers NSE scriptNmap Projectnmap.org/nsedoc/scripts/ssl-enum-ciphers.html
  4. testssl.shtestssl.sh project (GitHub)github.com/testssl/testssl.sh
  5. ssh-auditssh-audit project (GitHub)github.com/jtesta/ssh-audit
  6. Sonar Cryptography Plugin (CBOMkit-hyperion)CBOMkit / Post-Quantum Cryptography Alliance (GitHub)github.com/cbomkit/sonar-cryptography
  7. cdxgen, CycloneDX GeneratorOWASP CycloneDX (GitHub)github.com/CycloneDX/cdxgen
  8. PQCA CBOMkit Architecture (16 March 2026)Post-Quantum Cryptography Alliancepqca.org/blog/2026/pqca-cbomkit-architecture/
  9. PKCS #11 Specification Version 3.1OASIS Openwww.oasis-open.org/standard/pkcs-11-specification-version-3-1/
  10. CycloneDX v1.6 JSON Reference (bom-1.6 schema)OWASP CycloneDXcyclonedx.org/docs/1.6/json/
  11. Technical Guidelines on SBOM, QBOM & CBOM, AIBOM and HBOM, Version 2.0 (9 July 2025)CERT-In, Government of Indiawww.cert-in.org.in/PDF/TechnicalGuidelines-on-SBOM,QBOM&CBOM,AIBOM_and_HBOM_ver2.0.pdf

Sources checked in September 2026. Regulations and guidance change; always refer to the issuing body’s current publication. This content is for general information and is not legal advice.

Related CBOM guides

Across the BOM Suite

Put your CBOM under governance.Cryptographic visibility with continuous correlation and timestamped evidence.